EXPLORATOR

mjcorreia
A Serra do Caramulo estende-se por vários concelhos, pelo que a informação da etiqueta não permite avaliar em que concelho foi feita a colheita
2021-07-30 14:39:34

mjcorreia
Nas Portas do Rodão o Rio Tejo faz fronteira entre os concelhos de Vila Velha do Rodão e de Nisa. A colheita foi feita na margem esquerda do rio, a qual se localiza no concelho de Nisa
2021-07-30 14:37:21

mjcorreia
A Praia do Cabedelo pertence ao distrito de Coimbra, mas o concelho é o da Figueira da Foz
2021-07-30 14:31:02
graouscy
For United States, you will write the State, not the County. That means you write the highest administrative level before United States. Here, I think, we have to write the highest before Portugal, which is Coimbra.
2021-07-30 15:12:10

mjcorreia
Valezim é uma freguesia do concelho de Seia. Neste caso a Guarda corresponde ao distrito e não ao concelho: https://www.codigo-postal.pt/seia/valezim-lugar/
2021-07-30 14:22:23
graouscy
For United States, you will write the State, not the County. That means you write the highest administrative level before United States. Here, I think, we have to write the highest before Portugal, which is Guarda. Anyway, the name will be reported in "Locality"
2021-07-30 15:18:11

mjcorreia
A freguesia de Pena Verde pertence ao Distrito da Guarda mas ao CONCELHO de Aguiar da Beira: https://www.cm-aguiardabeira.pt/freguesias/penaverde
2021-07-30 14:12:42
graouscy
For United States, you will write the State, not the County. That means you write the highest administrative level before United States. Here, I think, we have to write the highest before Portugal, which is Guarda.
2021-07-30 15:15:17
mjcorreia
According with the instructions given, the administrative level that should be introduced in this field is "Concelho" rather than "Distrito"
2021-07-30 21:02:05

graouscy
Here same label with N° Kew 99 and "coll. oct. 1946" https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/collection/p/item/p03622712?listIndex=40&listCount=81 I suppose then that the date here (with N° Kew 82) is oct 1946.
2021-07-24 22:03:35
acmacariol
A informação disponível é October 194-.
2022-02-24 16:28:54
Isabel B.
Consta a informação "October 194-", portanto, poderá ser qualquer ano entre 1940 e 1949
2022-02-24 16:29:32
Joaquim Santos UC
Thank you graouscy for this hint. 1946 seems to be the right year for this specimen!
2022-02-27 19:50:35

graouscy
Legi (from latin) = I collected ; then collector : Moura, Armando Reis
2021-07-24 21:07:47

HACKED_BY_IDOR
This specimen seems to have a determination on the orginal label as Helianthemum guttatum, by Cosson. Later on, Willkomm added var. eriocaulon (greek letters stand for varieties). The fact that he added the "a" letter at the begining means that he refers with this det. to the plant on the left? Maybe In any case, having two determinations seems right: one at the species level by Cosson, and a more recent one by Willkomm at the variety level, as the current version on the catalogue: http://coicatalogue.uc.pt/specimen/61409
2021-07-21 18:40:45

recent comments