recent comments

COI00110670 - determination
  • phil
    Line 1, there is a determinator and a date.
    2025-05-17 15:25:50
  • Joaquim Santos UC
    Thank you @phil. I guess when you wrote the comment it was because other users were suggesting the oldest determination (no determiner and no date) to go on line 1. Meanwhile the right determinations went into the right place: the most recent on line 1. To those wondering why is that, rather than the last line, is because we need to indicate on the central database which is the current determination when ingesting the data, so having it on 1st place is the easiest way because it's always the same position for every specimen.
    2025-05-20 09:34:51
COI00110669 - determination
  • phil
    Line 1, there is a determinator and a date.
    2025-05-17 15:23:29
COI00105389 - determination
  • phil
    The determination was made a few days later by consulting a flora, the date is unknown.
    2025-05-17 08:15:38
  • Joaquim Santos UC
    Thanks for pointing that out @phil. Indeed the two most recent determinations have determiners and dates, but the oldest one on the specimen label has no determiners nor determination date assigned, so we should not assume that.
    2025-05-20 09:26:01
COI00105355 - determination
COI00110983 - altitude
  • Loreto Library
    unsure about 67
    2025-05-12 03:38:51
  • Joaquim Santos UC
    The altitude field is empty. the typewritten 67 refers to the date (year 1967)
    2025-05-13 09:28:32
COI00108275 - given_by
  • MargaridaJesus
    A etiqueta original é do herbário do Centro de Investigação Científica Algodoeira (Moçambique)
    2025-05-09 17:49:14
  • Joaquim Santos UC
    Obrigado @MargaridaJesus. Os exemplares por vezes passam por diferentes instituições. Na nossa base de dados neste momento apenas podemos registar uma. É discutível qual será a melhor, mas aqui tendemos a privilegiar a primeira. Vou adicionar essa informação às instruções!
    2025-05-13 09:39:20
COI00108262 - given_by
  • MargaridaJesus
    A etiqueta original é do herbário do Centro de Investigação Científica Algodoeira (Moçambique)
    2025-05-09 17:47:14
COI00108171 - given_by
  • phil
    44971 = collector number of Chevalier
    2025-05-04 16:04:10
COI00110991 - collection_date
  • graouscy
    Collection date = 1884. Determination date 2022
    2025-05-03 17:41:49
COI00108132 - cultivated
  • phil
    no is not n.a.
    2025-05-03 06:25:15
  • Joaquim Santos UC
    thank you @phil. You are right. Apparently I did not configure this field in the most appropriate way. The issue is that the labels often only say when a plant is cultivated, and omit this when they are not. In our central database, this is a checkbox that we check when cultivated. I have changed the form to have only "yes" as an option, and if no information about cultivation, people select the "no information" checkbox. Hope this is more clear about how to fill in this field.
    2025-05-13 10:20:40