recent comments

COI00111114 - trip_project

• graouscy

  The exemple given for "expedition / project" is the same as here : only "Iter Angolanum 1937"
  2025-05-31 16:51:24

COI00111113 - trip_project

• graouscy

  The exemple given for "expedition / project" is the same as here : only "Iter Angolanum 1937"
  2025-05-31 16:50:44

COI00111111 - trip_project

• graouscy

  The exemple given for "expedition / project" is the same as here : only "Iter Angolanum 1937"
  2025-05-31 16:50:01

COI00111109 - trip_project

• graouscy

  The exemple given for "expedition / project" is the same as here : only "Iter Angolanum 1937"
  2025-05-31 16:48:44

COI00111121 - trip_project

• graouscy

  The exemple given for "expedition / project" is the same as here : only "Iter Angolanum 1937"
  2025-05-31 16:39:55

COI00110665 - determination

• MargaridaJesus

  a determinação da 1ª linha é "Chrysopogon aff. grillus ou Chrysopogon grillus var. calcaratus"
  2025-05-28 10:49:46

COI00102708 - determination

• phil

  ligne 2. It's a good D : Emídio : https://bionomia.net/Q131425381/specimens?action=collected&family=Juncaceae
  2025-05-23 11:34:59

• Joaquim Santos UC

  thanks @phil. I'm glad you are aware of Bionomia. Once our specimens get a collector or determined validated, they are ingested into our main database, where people get assigned global universal identifiers (Wikidata and ORCID). On every synchronization with GBIF data gets updated and can be used by Bionomia to assign specimens to the right people. We have also a mechanism in place that gets data from Bionomia and add people's identifiers on our database to specimens that volunteers assing on Bionomia ;-)
  2025-05-26 12:24:46

COI00102680 - determination

• phil

  Le ! é uma confirmação
  2025-05-22 14:38:32

• Joaquim Santos UC

  good observation @phil! The exclamation mark is indeed used often to indicate agreement with the existing determination. I will add this info to the helper
  2025-05-23 08:33:32

COI00110670 - determination

• phil

  Line 1, there is a determinator and a date.
  2025-05-17 15:25:50

• Joaquim Santos UC

  Thank you @phil. I guess when you wrote the comment it was because other users were suggesting the oldest determination (no determiner and no date) to go on line 1. Meanwhile the right determinations went into the right place: the most recent on line 1. To those wondering why is that, rather than the last line, is because we need to indicate on the central database which is the current determination when ingesting the data, so having it on 1st place is the easiest way because it's always the same position for every specimen.
  2025-05-20 09:34:51

COI00110669 - determination

• phil

  Line 1, there is a determinator and a date.
  2025-05-17 15:23:29

• «
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• ...
• 100
• 101
• »