EXPLORATOR

graouscy
https://kiki.huh.harvard.edu/databases/rdfgen.php?uuid=6f1b84d8-1f51-4a6f-9edb-e72f7c03f714
2025-07-06 06:06:21
graouscy
67 is the collection number (see the left label ) It is not a date and can't be 1967
2025-07-06 06:13:29
Joaquim Santos UC
26 setembro 907: pencil note (very faint) on the left label. Consistent with the specimen http://coicatalogue.uc.pt/specimen/COI00094253
2025-07-08 10:22:39

MargaridaJesus
etiqueta original ilegível
2025-07-04 17:44:33
graouscy
Collector : Braga, Antonio José Rodrigues https://kiki.huh.harvard.edu/databases/botanist_search.php?mode=details&id=19590
2025-07-06 06:01:17
Joaquim Santos UC
Thanks @graouscy. It's definetly Braga, but now that I have seen this specimen I have doubts about being A. J. R.: http://coicatalogue.uc.pt/specimen/COI00094253. It states "C. Braga".
2025-07-08 10:18:41

João Santos
Também é referida a data de colheita 1908/04
2025-07-03 16:54:39

phil
What does "teste !" mean?
2025-07-02 12:43:24
Joaquim Santos UC
This one was intriguing! We didn't know this, had to look it up. We found this text: «When a researcher completely agrees with the previous scientific name on a specimen an exclamation point, “stet” or “teste” are sometimes used in place of the name». The exclamation sign is common, but the "teste" was new. So, in htis case this determination is the same name as the previous one
2025-07-08 09:27:08

Bsteele86
Field number may be cut off at bottom of scan
2025-06-27 09:27:11
Joaquim Santos UC
Hi @Bsteele86. Sometimes this ahppens indeed, but in this case you can see the margin of the label at the bottom. The field number is right after the collector's name - and has actually got validated :-) (probably after your comment)
2025-06-30 16:34:50

graouscy
The exemple given for "expedition / project" is the same as here : only "Iter Angolanum 1937"
2025-05-31 16:53:45
Joaquim Santos UC
Thanks @graouscy. Indeed we want the data to be as consistent as possible. Sometimes different text get validated for the same information. The good news is that we will be able to set a definitive value later on if needed by matching those text!
2025-06-03 07:51:56